As you can see the Ted Mobius Transformation adds age and a tux. |
A Mobius Transformation is a transformation from the Riemannian Sphere to the Riemmanian Sphere T(z) = (az+ b)/(cz+ d), where a,b,c,d are complex numbers such that ad-bc !=0. That last condition may remind a mathematical reader of a condition of an invertible 2x2 matrix.
Let's look at some inputs for z to see how our sphere changes. Some of the following text may be hard to parse over blogger (I'll try to format it in a way that's not too bad), but if you spend a second, you can easily convince yourself it's true. Maybe one day I'll get Latex and rewrite some of these lines.
T(∞)= (a∞ +b)/(c∞ +d) = a/c. That makes sense, as if a and c are infinitely large, then adding or subtracting a finite number won't change either of them. This also shows why we need to be on the Riemannian Sphere, because on the complex plane (without infinity) then there's no number we can plug into T(z) to get a/c.
T(0) = (a0 +b)/(c0 +d)= b/d.
T(1) = (a1 +b)/(c1 +d)= (a+b)/(c+d).
These are some of the intuitive numbers to plug in, to see what we'd get. But now let's try some less initially intuitive but geometrically significant numbers.
T(-d/c) = (-ad/c +b)/(-cd/c +d) = (-ad +bc)/(-cd +dc) = (-ad +bc)/0) = ∞. But a tricky reader might want to test this function is well defined. "How do you know you'll never get 0/0?" Well, tricky reader, the only way we'd get 0/0 would be if -ad
T(-b/a) = (-ab/a +b)/(-cb/a +d) = (-b +b)/(ad - bc) = 0/(-ad +bc) = 0. Remember, ad-bc can't equal 0, so it remains well defined.
This next one will be a bit more complicated looking, so bear with me. I'm going to color code fractions:
T((d-b)/(a-c)) = (a ((d-b)/(a-c)) +b)/(c ((d-b)/(a-c)) +d) = ((ad-ba)/(a-c) + (ba-bc)/(a-c))/((cd-cd)/(a-c) + (da-da)/(a-c)) = ((ad-bc)/(a-c))/(ad-bc)/(a-c)) = 1.
You can convince yourself now that these transformations work under composition and can be inverted.
Mobius Transformations can be thought of as a series of composition of different transformations. First take T(z) = z and scale it by c and translate it by d. Now you have T(z) = cz +d. Second, invert it so that T(z) = 1/(cz + d). Third, scale it by -1/c (almost like conjugating with the first step), and get T(z) = -1/c(cz + d). Finally, translate that by a/c: a/c - 1/c(cz + d). I'll do the algebraic manipulation below, or you can trust me that after some finagling, it comes out to T(z) = (az +b)/(cz +d). The key to the algebraic manipulation, which took me frustratingly way, way too long to see is realizing that ad-bc =1.
a/c - 1/c(cz + d) = a/c - (bc -ad)/c(cz + d)= (a(cz +d) + bc - ad)/ (c(cz+d)) = (caz + da + bc -ad)/(c(cz+d) = (caz +bc)/(c(cz+d)) = (az+b)/(cz+d).
That's really cool for several reasons. First, it makes finding the inverse very easy, because instead of composing T4∘T3∘T2∘T1(z), you can just do T-11∘T-12∘T-13∘T-14(z). Also if we take all of our Mobius Transformations to create a group under composition, with easily seen generators.
Pretty much, Mobius Transformations send three points to any other three points, and by doing so, determine the entire transformation of the sphere. This means we can determine exactly how the sphere acts based on where 0, 1, and ∞ are sent. But we can also look at other points. You can see yourself that given points a,b,c, T(z)= (z-a)/(z-b) * (c-b)/(c-a) sends a to 0, b to ∞, and c to 1.
Or going a step further, you can see that given poitns a,b,c,d,e,f, if T(z) = w is a Mobius transformation, and (z-a)/(z-b) * (c-b)/(c-a) = (w-d)/(w-e) * (f-e)/(f-d), then the transformation maps a to d, b to e, and c to f.
Take a look at this picture I drew representing a Mobius Transformation abstractly:
First, for clarification, does ad-bc !=0 mean that ad - bc never equals zero? Because I've never seen the exclamation mark like that before. Also, does composing T4∘T3∘T2∘T1(z) mean you're taking the inverse of it?
ReplyDeleteYes, != is used sometimes in coding to mean "not equal." Blogger just doesn't recognize some math symbols, and =/= is awkwardly long.
ReplyDeleteSorry, there was a typo before. What I was saying was that if we can find our Mobius Transformation by composing a series of functions, we can find the Mobius Transformation's inverse by reversing and inverting each of those functions. I believe it's fixed now if you look up.
Love your puns! Forgetful Functor. Ha ha!!
ReplyDeleteThis is awesome. I need to get you math type so you can put in the equations you want in the format you want it. I can tell you really understand Mobius transformations, Connor! Great Job!
Love your puns! Forgetful Functor. Ha ha!!
ReplyDeleteThis is awesome. I need to get you math type so you can put in the equations you want in the format you want it. I can tell you really understand Mobius transformations, Connor! Great Job!
Why does ad-bc=1?
ReplyDeleteGreat question. Working with ad-bc=1 allows us to have more correspondences with certain 2x2 matrix groups, as that would ad-bc=1 for all elements means everyone has a determinant of 1, which is awesome.
Delete